tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21988030.post115031948396884464..comments2024-02-19T06:21:58.706+00:00Comments on Board Games - Creation And Play: Strategy In Board GamesJackson Popehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12685562784078130612noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21988030.post-1150375763667014252006-06-15T13:49:00.000+01:002006-06-15T13:49:00.000+01:00I'd agree with your first point though that sounds...I'd agree with your first point though that sounds a little more wargame-y than Eurogame-y.<BR/><BR/>I guess what I mean is that I like games where it is not immediately obvious to my opponents what I intend to do to win. Even though I have a strategy that I am undertaking.Jackson Popehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12685562784078130612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21988030.post-1150360000366179472006-06-15T09:26:00.000+01:002006-06-15T09:26:00.000+01:00I agree with all but the underhanded part.If I dec...I agree with all but the underhanded part.<BR/><BR/>If I decide to move my armies and atack you from the south, or move my armies and attack you from the north, that's two entirely different stategies, and neither are particularly underhanded. I just don't see this as a requirement.<BR/><BR/>Tactics can be underhanded. But again, they don't have to be. A feint to the south when I am attacking from the north is an underhanded tactic. But choosing to attack on foot or by horse to implement my north attacking strategy are both tactics and neither are underhanded.<BR/><BR/>YehudaYehuda Berlingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16038826060312027387noreply@blogger.com